TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP SecurityvsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)

See exactly how 3GPP Security controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 32% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 3GPP Security controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3GPP Security: Communications Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3GPP Security: Information Security Policies(2 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-04Roles and responsibilities definition2 targets
→CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
→CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities

3GPP Security: Access Control(3 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-12User access management and provisioning
→CRAF-3.1Access Control
3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management
→CRAF-3.1Access Control
3GPP-SEC-14Privileged access management
→CRAF-3.1Access Control

3GPP Security: Cryptography(4 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-17Encryption of data at rest
→CRAF-3.2Data Security
3GPP-SEC-18Encryption of data in transit
→CRAF-3.2Data Security
3GPP-SEC-19Certificate management
→CRAF-3.2Data Security
3GPP-SEC-20Key lifecycle management
→CRAF-3.2Data Security

3GPP Security: Operations Security(2 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-23Backup and recovery procedures
→CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience
3GPP-SEC-25Technical vulnerability management
→CRAF-4.3Security Testing

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security comparisons

3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-18316 mappings3GPP Security vs MITRE ATT&CK16 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP SAMM16 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP ASVS16 mappings3GPP Security vs PTES16 mappings3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-13716 mappings3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-15016 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP MASVS16 mappings

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)15 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)15 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

3GPP Security has 31 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3GPP Security: Communications Security, where 5 3GPP Security controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

Of 31 total 3GPP Security controls, 10 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

21 3GPP Security controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in 3GPP Security: Communications Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3GPP Security: Communications Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.