TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) with 5% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Authentication and Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(3 mappings)

A.2Risk Assessment3 targets
→DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
→DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
→RA-1Security Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) comparisons

German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)8 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)7 mappingsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)7 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)7 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)7 mappingsUK Modern Slavery Act 2015 vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)7 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)7 mappingsIEC 62443 vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Authentication and Key Management, where 5 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 1 map directly to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

21 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Authentication and Key Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Authentication and Key Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.