Cross-Framework Mapping

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)vsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)

See exactly how AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls map to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) maps to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reporting Obligations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AML/CTF Program Requirements(3 mappings)

AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment3 targets
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment

Reporting Obligations(10 mappings)

MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation4 targets
IG-1Annual Reporting
IG-4Incident Response
RA-2Human Rights Risk Identification
RA-4Rule of Law Assessment
MSA-14Joint Statements3 targets
IG-4Incident Response
RA-2Human Rights Risk Identification
RA-4Rule of Law Assessment
MSA-15Voluntary Statements3 targets
IG-4Incident Response
RA-2Human Rights Risk Identification
RA-4Rule of Law Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons

Other Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) has 41 controls across its framework, while Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reporting Obligations, where 14 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

Of 41 total AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls, 4 map directly to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

37 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Reporting Obligations with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Reporting Obligations (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.