TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Architecture Overview(3 mappings)

5.3Management of Allergens3 targets
→2.1.1Management Policy
→2.1.2Management Responsibility
→2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture

Authentication and Key Management(2 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
→TA-3Remediation of Findings
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions
→TA-3Remediation of Findings

Radio and Access Network Security(2 mappings)

6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers
→TA-3Remediation of Findings
6.9Handover Security
→TA-3Remediation of Findings

Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(4 mappings)

7.1Training and Competence3 targets
→2.1.1Management Policy
→2.1.2Management Responsibility
→2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture
9.2Network Domain Security
→TA-3Remediation of Findings

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(3 mappings)

A.2Risk Assessment3 targets
→DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
→DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
→RA-1Security Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework comparisons

SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework10 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework9 mappingsILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework9 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework9 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework8 mappingsNIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework8 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework8 mappingsEU NIS2 Directive — Transport Sector Requirements vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 8 map directly to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?

14 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subscriber Privacy and Service Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.