Cross-Framework Mapping

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)vsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework

See exactly how Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls map to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) maps to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework with 21% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title II - Rights of Data Subjects.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Title IV - Obligations of Data Controllers and Processors(5 mappings)

Art. 14 quaterProtection by Design and Default
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
Art. 15 bisProcessor Obligations
TA-3Remediation of Findings
Art. 15 terData Protection Impact Assessment3 targets
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment

Title I - General Provisions and Definitions(1 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition
TA-3Remediation of Findings

Title VI - Cross-Border Transfers(4 mappings)

Art. 28Administrative Measures4 targets
MC-1Senior Management Support
TR-1Periodic Training Program
TR-2Job-Specific Training
TR-4Training Updates

Title II - Rights of Data Subjects(1 mappings)

Art. 8Data Categories
TA-3Remediation of Findings

Related Comparisons

Other Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) comparisons

Other US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) has 29 controls across its framework, while US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title II - Rights of Data Subjects, where 6 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls have no direct US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?

Of 29 total Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls, 6 map directly to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?

23 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls have no direct equivalent in US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Title II - Rights of Data Subjects with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Title II - Rights of Data Subjects (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.