3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers
See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Authentication and Key Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(8 mappings)
Radio and Access Network Security(2 mappings)
Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons
Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?
3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Authentication and Key Management, where 5 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers equivalent.
How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?
Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 8 map directly to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?
14 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. The highest concentration of gaps is in Authentication and Key Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?
The domain with the highest gap count is Authentication and Key Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.