TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination with 27% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Authentication and Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(5 mappings)

6.12Subscription Identifier Privacy
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection
A.2Risk Assessment
→SOC-CY-DC5Risk Assessment Process
A.4Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→SOC-CY-DC1Nature of Business and Operations
→SOC-CY-DC3Cybersecurity Risk Management Objectives
→SOC-CY-DC4Governance Structure

Radio and Access Network Security(2 mappings)

6.6RRC and UP Ciphering and Integrity
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection
6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection

Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(1 mappings)

9.1N32 Interface Security (PRINS/TLS)
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination comparisons

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Authentication and Key Management, where 5 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 6 map directly to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

16 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination. The highest concentration of gaps is in Authentication and Key Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

The domain with the highest gap count is Authentication and Key Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.