TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for ExchangesvsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination

See exactly how MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls map to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
48%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges maps to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination with 48% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(19 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue2 targets
→SOC-CY-S1Logical and Physical Access Controls
→SOC-CY-S2System Operations
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management3 targets
→SOC-CY-A2Disaster Recovery
→SOC-CY-DC5Risk Assessment Process
→SOC-CY-S2System Operations
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
→SOC-CY-S1Logical and Physical Access Controls
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
→SOC-CY-DC2Nature of Sensitive Information
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection2 targets
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection
→SOC-CY-S1Logical and Physical Access Controls
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management
→SOC-CY-S3Change Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management4 targets
→SOC-CY-DC1Nature of Business and Operations
→SOC-CY-DC3Cybersecurity Risk Management Objectives
→SOC-CY-DC4Governance Structure
→SOC-CY-DC5Risk Assessment Process
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud2 targets
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection
→SOC-CY-DC5Risk Assessment Process
PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls2 targets
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection
→SOC-CY-S1Logical and Physical Access Controls
PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
→SOC-CY-S2System Operations

Related Comparisons

Other MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges comparisons

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CSA CCM v415 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FedRAMP Rev 515 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments14 mappings

Other SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination comparisons

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges has 21 controls across its framework, while SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 11 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls have no direct SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination equivalent.

How many controls map between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

Of 21 total MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls, 10 map directly to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls — representing 48% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

11 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls have no direct equivalent in SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.