TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsProposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

36
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) with 27% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 36 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authentication and Key Management(14 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy7 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Art.2Definitions
→Art.8Prohibited Acts
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions7 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Art.2Definitions
→Art.8Prohibited Acts

Radio and Access Network Security(6 mappings)

6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers6 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Art.2Definitions

+16 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)17 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingseIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 6 map directly to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

16 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491). The highest concentration of gaps is in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subscriber Privacy and Service Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.