TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 27% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(3 mappings)

6.12Subscription Identifier Privacy
→E26-R6Secure remote access
A.2Risk Assessment
→E26-R3Risk assessment
A.3Asset Management
→E26-R1Asset inventory

Authentication and Key Management(2 mappings)

6.4Secondary Authentication
→E27-R3User authentication
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions
→E27-R3User authentication

Radio and Access Network Security(1 mappings)

6.6RRC and UP Ciphering and Integrity
→E26-R6Secure remote access

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 6 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

16 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.