TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsBREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method with 41% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Architecture Overview.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authentication and Key Management(2 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
→PMF-M.1Privacy Program Governance
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions
→PMF-M.1Privacy Program Governance

Radio and Access Network Security(2 mappings)

6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers
→PMF-M.1Privacy Program Governance
6.9Handover Security
→PMF-M.1Privacy Program Governance

Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(1 mappings)

9.2Network Domain Security
→PMF-M.1Privacy Program Governance

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(4 mappings)

A.1Governance Framework
→Mat 03Responsible Sourcing of Materials
A.2Risk Assessment
→PMF-M.3Privacy Risk Assessment
A.3Asset Management
→Mat 03Responsible Sourcing of Materials
A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
→Mat 03Responsible Sourcing of Materials

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method comparisons

CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) vs BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method10 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method10 mappingsNIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile vs BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method10 mappingsCDP Corporate Questionnaire vs BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method9 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) vs BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method8 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method8 mappingsISO 26000:2010 vs BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method7 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation vs BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Architecture Overview, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 9 map directly to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

13 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Architecture Overview with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Architecture Overview (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.