3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)vsNIST SP 800-187
See exactly how 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls map to NIST SP 800-187. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) maps to NIST SP 800-187 with 51% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Security for Specific Services.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.
Interworking(2 mappings)
Service Security(1 mappings)
Roaming Security(1 mappings)
User Plane(1 mappings)
Security Architecture(1 mappings)
Authentication(1 mappings)
Key Management(1 mappings)
Signaling Security(3 mappings)
Core Network Security(1 mappings)
Cryptography(1 mappings)
General Security Architecture(2 mappings)
Authentication Procedures(4 mappings)
Security for NAS and AS Protocols(1 mappings)
+3 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 704 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) to NIST SP 800-187 crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-187 controls your existing 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 51% in the header counts how many 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-187 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-187 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 704 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and NIST SP 800-187?
3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) has 43 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-187 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (51% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security for Specific Services, where 4 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-187 equivalent.
How many controls map between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and NIST SP 800-187?
Of 43 total 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls, 22 map directly to NIST SP 800-187 controls, representing 51% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) to NIST SP 800-187?
21 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-187. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security for Specific Services with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and NIST SP 800-187?
The domain with the highest gap count is Security for Specific Services (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.