Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)vsISO/SAE 21434

See exactly how 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls map to ISO/SAE 21434. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) maps to ISO/SAE 21434 with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls identifies 38 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Security for Specific Services.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Service Based Architecture Security(5 mappings)

TS33.501-13.1NF Registration and Discovery Security
ISO21434-14Privileged access management
TS33.501-13.2NF Service Authorization3 targets
ISO21434-16Cryptographic policy and key management
ISO21434-17Encryption of data at rest
ISO21434-19Certificate management
TS33.501-13.4OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
ISO21434-14Privileged access management

Authentication Procedures(1 mappings)

TS33.501-6.1Authentication Framework
ISO21434-13Authentication and password management

Security for NAS and AS Protocols(2 mappings)

TS33.501-6.6AS Security2 targets
ISO21434-17Encryption of data at rest
ISO21434-18Encryption of data in transit
Coverage crosswalk

A 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) to ISO/SAE 21434 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO/SAE 21434 controls your existing 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) into ISO/SAE 21434
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/SAE 21434 into 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) to ISO/SAE 21434 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 12% in the header counts how many 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO/SAE 21434 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and ISO/SAE 21434?

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) has 43 controls across its framework, while ISO/SAE 21434 covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security for Specific Services, where 4 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls have no direct ISO/SAE 21434 equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and ISO/SAE 21434?

Of 43 total 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls, 5 map directly to ISO/SAE 21434 controls, representing 12% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) to ISO/SAE 21434?

38 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/SAE 21434. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security for Specific Services with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and ISO/SAE 21434?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security for Specific Services (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.