TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)vsWCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)

See exactly how 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls map to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) maps to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) with 6% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Facilities (Subpart C)(3 mappings)

58.43Animal Care Facilities2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
58.49Laboratory Operation Areas
→CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security

Related Comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) comparisons

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts4 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 20214 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20243 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs FedRAMP Rev 53 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20223 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)3 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)3 mappings

Other WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) comparisons

WCO Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Framework vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)12 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) has 31 controls across its framework, while WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G), where 5 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls have no direct WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) equivalent.

How many controls map between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

Of 31 total 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls, 2 map directly to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

29 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls have no direct equivalent in WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021). The highest concentration of gaps is in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.