Cross-Framework Mapping

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)vsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems

See exactly how 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls map to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) maps to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems with 10% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

General Provisions (Subpart A)(4 mappings)

58.1Scope2 targets
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
GLI33-1.2Wager Types and Rules
58.3Definitions2 targets
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
GLI33-1.2Wager Types and Rules

Facilities (Subpart C)(2 mappings)

58.43Animal Care Facilities2 targets
EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements

Related Comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) comparisons

Other GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) has 31 controls across its framework, while GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G), where 5 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls have no direct GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

Of 31 total 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls, 3 map directly to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) to GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

28 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls have no direct equivalent in GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.