Cross-Framework Mapping

21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing PracticevsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021

See exactly how 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls map to UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
76
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice maps to UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 with 3% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 78 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls identifies 76 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Subpart F - Production and Process Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 78 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Subpart A - General Provisions(1 mappings)

CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 - Definitions
UK-TSA-NET-01Security Architecture

Subpart J - Records and Reports(1 mappings)

CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 - Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records
UK-TSA-NET-03Supply Chain Security

Related Comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice comparisons

Other UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice and UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021?

21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice has 78 controls across its framework, while UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subpart F - Production and Process Controls, where 8 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 equivalent.

How many controls map between 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice and UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021?

Of 78 total 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls, 2 map directly to UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 76 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice to UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021?

76 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct equivalent in UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021. The highest concentration of gaps is in Subpart F - Production and Process Controls with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice and UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subpart F - Production and Process Controls (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.