Cross-Framework Mapping

21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing PracticevsISO/IEC 27003:2017

See exactly how 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls map to ISO/IEC 27003:2017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
71
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice maps to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 6% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 78 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls identifies 73 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Subpart J - Records and Reports.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 78 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Subpart A - General Provisions(1 mappings)

CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 - Definitions
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS

Subpart C - Buildings and Facilities(1 mappings)

CFR211-C-48Section 211.48 - Plumbing
8.5Control effectiveness review

Subpart F - Production and Process Controls(1 mappings)

CFR211-F-113Section 211.113 - Control of Microbiological Contamination
8.5Control effectiveness review

Subpart I - Laboratory Controls(1 mappings)

CFR211-I-176Section 211.176 - Penicillin Contamination
8.5Control effectiveness review

Subpart J - Records and Reports(3 mappings)

CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 - Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records3 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control

Related Comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice has 78 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27003:2017 covers 72 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subpart J - Records and Reports, where 8 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27003:2017 equivalent.

How many controls map between 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

Of 78 total 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 73 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice to ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

73 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27003:2017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Subpart J - Records and Reports with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subpart J - Records and Reports (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.