Cross-Framework Mapping

21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing PracticevsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement

See exactly how 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls map to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
52
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice maps to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement with 4% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls identifies 55 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Subpart F — Production and Process Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subpart A — General Provisions(2 mappings)

CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 — Definitions2 targets
ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement
ISO-20400-7.2Integrating sustainability into specifications

Subpart J — Records and Reports(3 mappings)

CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records3 targets
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning

Related Comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice has 57 controls across its framework, while ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subpart F — Production and Process Controls, where 8 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement equivalent.

How many controls map between 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

Of 57 total 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls, 2 map directly to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 55 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

55 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement. The highest concentration of gaps is in Subpart F — Production and Process Controls with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subpart F — Production and Process Controls (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.