When a tenant asks on the approved form to keep a stated pet, the lessor replies in writing within 14 days stating whether it approves, any conditions, and for a refusal the ground and why the lessor believes it applies. The only grounds are: too many animals; unsuitable premises (fencing, space); likely damage not repairable for less than the bond; unacceptable health and safety risk; breach of a law, by-law, park rule or licence condition; the tenant not agreeing to reasonable conditions; or the animal not being a pet. 'No pets allowed' is not a reason. Without a compliant reply in time, the pet is taken to be approved, and approval continues for the pet's life through renewals and changes of lessor or agent. Working dogs need no approval.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.