NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-CA-8: Penetration testing

Requires penetration testing to be conducted on organization-defined systems or components at an organization-defined frequency, so that control effectiveness is tested by simulated adversary activity rather than by inspection alone.

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 116 controls across 61 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 10 controls

  • 11.4.1 Penetration testing methodology defined
  • 11.4.2 Internal penetration testing annually
  • 11.4.3 External penetration testing annually
  • 11.4.4 Pen test findings remediated
  • 11.4.5 Segmentation testing
  • 11.4.6 Segmentation testing (service providers) every 6 months
  • 11.4.7 Multi-tenant pen test support
  • 11.5.1 IDS/IPS in place
  • 6.2.3 Custom software reviewed prior to production
  • 6.4.1 For public-facing web applications, new threats and vulnerabilities are addressed on an ongoing basis and these applications are protected against known attacks as follows: • Reviewing public-facing web applications via manual or automated application

CIS Controls v8 · 5 controls

  • CIS-16.13 Conduct Application Penetration Testing
  • CIS-18.1 Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program
  • CIS-18.2 Perform Periodic External Penetration Tests
  • CIS-18.4 Validate Security Measures
  • CIS-18.5 Perform Periodic Internal Penetration Tests

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
  • 8.34 Protection of information systems during audit testing
  • 8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 · 4 controls

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

  • CA-8 Penetration Testing
  • CA-8(1) Penetration Testing | Independent Penetration Testing Agent or Team. Employ an independent penetration testing agent or team to perform penetration testing on the system or system components
  • CA-8(2) Penetration Testing | Red Team Exercises. Employ the following red-team exercises to simulate attempts by adversaries to compromise organizational systems in accordance with applicable rules of engagement: [Assignment: organization-defined red team exercises]

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

  • CA-8 Penetration Testing
  • CA-8(1) Penetration Testing | Independent Penetration Testing Agent or Team. Employ an independent penetration testing agent or team to perform penetration testing on the system or system components
  • CA-8(2) Penetration Testing | Red Team Exercises. Employ the following red-team exercises to simulate attempts by adversaries to compromise organizational systems in accordance with applicable rules of engagement: [Assignment: organization-defined red team exercises]

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
  • 8.34 Protection of information systems during audit testing

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 · 3 controls

  • CISABD-2 Embrace Radical Transparency and Accountability
  • CISABD-3 Build Organizational Structure and Leadership for Secure Outcomes
  • SBD-DEV-07 Dependency Management and SBOM
  • ASBv3-DS-5 Integrate dynamic application security testing into DevOps pipeline
  • ASBv3-PV-7 Conduct regular red team operations

DORA · 2 controls

  • DORA-Art.25 Testing of ICT tools and systems
  • DORA-Art.26 Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-01 Improvements are identified from evaluations
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-04 Potential impacts and likelihoods of threats exploiting vulnerabilities are identified and recorded

NIST SP 800-218 · 2 controls

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-CC4.1 COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations
  • SOC2-CC7.1 Detection and monitoring procedures for security events are in place
  • ANSSI-HYG-38 Carry Out Regular Security Checks and Audits and Apply the Corrective Actions
  • AUCDR-IS-STEP4 Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program

BSI IT-Grundschutz · 1 control

  • BSI-14 Vulnerability scanning and management

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-OPS-19 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Penetration Tests
  • CPG-5.A Vulnerability Disclosure Program
  • TIBER-2.3 Active red team testing on live production

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

  • 8.5 Exercise programme

ISO 27017 · 1 control

ISO 27018 · 1 control

ISO 27043 · 1 control

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 · 1 control

  • 27011-8.5 Vulnerability and malware management

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 · 1 control

  • 29134-9.2 Report findings and recommendations

ISO/SAE 21434 · 1 control

  • NISTPF-8 Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

  • 3.12.1e Penetration Testing by Independent Agents

NIST SP 800-190 · 1 control

  • CA-8 Penetration Testing
  • 53A-D Penetration Testing

NIST SP 800-88 · 1 control

  • NISTSP88-7 Verification, Audit, Training, and Environmental/Safety Controls

NIST SP 800-92 · 1 control

  • NISTSP92-5 Log Analysis: Correlation, Baselining, Anomaly Detection, Alerting, Manual Review
  • NRFCS-2 Risk Assessment, Customer Data Inventory, Classification, and Retail Threat Model
  • NZISM-5 Network Security, System Hardening, and Application Security
  • ORANWG11-1 O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

OWASP SAMM · 1 control

  • OWASPSAMM-4 Verification: Architecture Assessment, Requirements-Driven Testing, Security Testing

OpenSSF Scorecard · 1 control

  • OSSFSC-2 Dependency Management, Pinning, Updates, Vulnerability Tracking
  • PASONE-6 Incident Management, Audit, Handover, Operational Phase, Decommissioning

PTES · 1 control

  • SAEIGHT-1 Child Labour and Young Worker Protection
  • SHAREASSESS-4 Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

SLSA · 1 control

  • SUPCHAIN-2 Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule

South Korea ISMS-P · 1 control

  • TSAPIPE-1 Cybersecurity Implementation Plan and Coordinator
  • UKOPRES-4 Incident Management, Lessons Learned, Comms

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring

You are reading one control. How much of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 have you already done?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-CA-8 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 163 of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 342 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 116 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.