Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-PV-7: Conduct regular red team operations

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 51 controls across 26 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-16.13 Conduct Application Penetration Testing
CIS-18.1 Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program
CIS-18.2 Perform Periodic External Penetration Tests
CIS-18.5 Perform Periodic Internal Penetration Tests

PCI DSS 4.0 · 4 controls

11.4.1 11.4.1 Penetration testing methodology defined and implemented
11.4.2 11.4.2 Internal penetration testing annually and after change
11.4.3 11.4.3 External penetration testing annually and after change
6.4.1 6.4.1 Public web application review or automated protection

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 3 controls

CCM-A&A-02 Independent Assessments
CCM-STA-11 Internal Compliance Testing
CCM-TVM-06 Penetration Testing

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

CA-8 Penetration Testing
CA-8(1) Penetration Testing | Independent Penetration Testing Agent or Team (CA-8(1))
CA-8(2) Penetration Testing | Red Team Exercises (CA-8(2))

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

CA-8 Penetration Testing
CA-8(1) Penetration Testing | Independent Penetration Testing Agent or Team (CA-8(1))
CA-8(2) Penetration Testing | Red Team Exercises (CA-8(2))

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

5.35 Independent review of information security
8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

5.35 Independent review of information security
8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

NIST SP 800-172 · 3 controls

3.11.5e Assess Effectiveness of Security Solutions
3.12.1e Penetration Testing by Independent Agents
3.14.7e Verify Correctness of Security Functions

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-CA-2 CA-2 Control Assessments
NIST800-CA-8 CA-8 Penetration Testing
NIST800-SA-11 SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

APRA CPS 234 · 2 controls

CPS234-22 Systematic Control Testing Program
CPS234-P30 Independence and Skill of Testing Personnel

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC10-BP07 Run simulations
SEC11-BP03 Perform regular penetration testing

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 2 controls

CFTC-SS-14 External Penetration Testing
CFTC-SS-34 Internal Penetration Testing

NIST SP 800-218 · 2 controls

SP800-218-PW.8.1 Executable Testing for Security
SP800-218-PW.8.2 Execute Security Testing

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-38 Carry Out Regular Security Checks and Audits and Apply the Corrective Actions

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System · 1 control

CBPR-PR-33 Testing the effectiveness of safeguards

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-STEP4 Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-19 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Penetration Tests

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

CA.L2-3.12.1 Security Control Assessment

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(8) Evaluation (Standard)

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-01 Improvements are identified from evaluations

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.12.01 Security Assessment

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 · 1 control

53A-D Penetration Testing

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(8) Evaluation (Standard)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-PV-7 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 583.5% covered · 14 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate78.8% covered · 18 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.172.9% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202269.4% covered · 26 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)65.9% covered · 29 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202261.2% covered · 33 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free