PCI DSS 4.0
Req 11: Test Security Regularly

PCI DSS 4.0 11.4.2: 11.4.2 Internal penetration testing annually and after change

Internal penetration testing must be performed: using the methodology the entity has defined; no less than annually; after every significant upgrade or change to infrastructure or applications; by a qualified tester, whether an internal resource or an external third party; and with organizational independence of the tester (a QSA or ASV is not required). Guidance (purpose): internal testing finds vulnerabilities and misconfigurations an attacker with some internal foothold could use, and can expose previously unknown systems that indicate change control failures. Objective under the customized approach: technical testing following the defined methodology verifies internal defenses as often as needed to keep pace with new and evolving attacks and to confirm that significant changes bring in no unknown vulnerabilities.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 38 controls across 22 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 5 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.4 CC3.4 Identifying and assessing significant changes (COSO principle 9)
  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
  • SOC2-CC6.6 CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary
  • SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
  • SOC2-CC8.1 CC8.1 Managing changes to procedures, software, data and infrastructure

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
  • 8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

  • NIST800-CA-8 CA-8 Penetration Testing
  • NIST800-PM-6 PM-6 Measures of Performance
  • SP800-53-CA Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring Family
  • CFTC-SS-33 Regular Periodic Objective Testing and Review of Automated Systems
  • CFTC-SS-34 Internal Penetration Testing

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-18.1 Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program
  • CIS-18.5 Perform Periodic Internal Penetration Tests

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

  • NIST-CSF-GV.OV-03 Organizational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-01 Improvements are identified from evaluations

NIST SP 800-172 · 2 controls

  • 3.12.1e Penetration Testing by Independent Agents
  • 3.14.7e Verify Correctness of Security Functions
  • P1-4.2.5 P1-4.2.5 Annual penetration testing
  • P1-4.2.6 P1-4.2.6 Penetration tests by qualified personnel

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

  • AUCDR-IS-STEP4 Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-OPS-19 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Penetration Tests

FedRAMP High · 1 control

  • CA-8 Penetration Testing

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

  • CA-8 Penetration Testing

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 6.9.6 Technical vulnerability management
  • 53A-D Penetration Testing

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Req 11: Test Security Regularly

You are reading one control. How much of PCI DSS 4.0 have you already done?

PCI DSS 4.0 11.4.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 38 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.