Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 CCM-TVM-06: Penetration Testing

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 38 controls across 23 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 6 controls

11.4.1 11.4.1 Penetration testing methodology defined and implemented
11.4.2 11.4.2 Internal penetration testing annually and after change
11.4.3 11.4.3 External penetration testing annually and after change
11.4.5 11.4.5 Annual segmentation penetration testing
11.4.7 11.4.7 Multi-tenant providers support customer penetration testing
6.4.1 6.4.1 Public web application review or automated protection

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-16.13 Conduct Application Penetration Testing
CIS-18.1 Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program
CIS-18.2 Perform Periodic External Penetration Tests
CIS-18.5 Perform Periodic Internal Penetration Tests

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 3 controls

CFTC-SS-14 External Penetration Testing
CFTC-SS-18 Independence of Testers
CFTC-SS-34 Internal Penetration Testing

DORA · 3 controls

DORA-Art.25 Testing of ICT tools and systems
DORA-Art.26 Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT
DORA-Art.27 Requirements for testers for the carrying out of TLPT

APRA CPS 234 · 2 controls

CPS234-22 Systematic Control Testing Program
CPS234-P30 Independence and Skill of Testing Personnel

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

CA-8 Penetration Testing
CA-8(1) Penetration Testing | Independent Penetration Testing Agent or Team (CA-8(1))

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

CA-8 Penetration Testing
CA-8(1) Penetration Testing | Independent Penetration Testing Agent or Team (CA-8(1))

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-38 Carry Out Regular Security Checks and Audits and Apply the Corrective Actions

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System · 1 control

CBPR-PR-33 Testing the effectiveness of safeguards

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC11-BP03 Perform regular penetration testing

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-STEP4 Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-PV-7 Conduct regular red team operations

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-19 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Penetration Tests

EU AI Act · 1 control

EUAI-Art.55 Obligations of providers of GPAI models with systemic risk

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-01 Improvements are identified from evaluations

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.12.1e Penetration Testing by Independent Agents

NIST SP 800-218 · 1 control

SP800-218-PW.8.1 Executable Testing for Security

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-CA-8 CA-8 Penetration Testing

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 · 1 control

53A-D Penetration Testing

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 have you already done?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 CCM-TVM-06 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 140 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 571.1% covered · 57 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate60.4% covered · 78 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.060.4% covered · 78 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)58.4% covered · 82 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202256.3% covered · 86 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 86 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 12 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free