OpenSSF Best Practices Badge Criteria
Silver level: Analysis – OpenSSF Best Practices Badge Criteria

OpenSSF Best Practices Badge Criteria silver.dynamic_analysis_unsafe: dynamic_analysis_unsafe (Silver, MUST)

Silver criterion dynamic_analysis_unsafe (MUST; group Analysis, Dynamic code analysis). Criterion text: If the software produced by the project includes software written using a memory-unsafe language (e.g., C or C++), then at least one dynamic tool (e.g., a fuzzer or web application scanner) MUST be routinely used in combination with a mechanism to detect memory safety problems such as buffer overwrites. If the project does not produce software written in a memory-unsafe language, choose "not applicable" (N/A). This raises the passing criterion of the same name (there SUGGESTED) to MUST at the silver level.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-218 · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Silver level: Analysis – OpenSSF Best Practices Badge Criteria

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.