NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Govern

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-GV.OV-03: Organizational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed

Organizational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 89 controls across 30 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 9 controls

  • 11.3.1 11.3.1 Quarterly internal vulnerability scans
  • 11.4.2 11.4.2 Internal penetration testing annually and after change
  • 12.1.2 12.1.2 Security policy reviewed annually and updated as needed
  • 12.10.2 12.10.2 Annual review and testing of the incident response plan
  • 12.10.6 12.10.6 Plan evolved from lessons learned and industry developments
  • 12.4.2 12.4.2 Quarterly reviews that personnel follow security procedures
  • 12.4.2.1 12.4.2.1 Documentation of quarterly operational reviews
  • 5.2.3 5.2.3 Periodic evaluation of components not at risk from malware
  • 7.2.4 7.2.4 User accounts and privileges reviewed every six months

ISO 27701:2019 · 7 controls

  • 5.7 Performance evaluation
  • 5.7.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
  • 5.7.2 Internal audit
  • 5.7.3 Management review
  • 5.8 Improvement
  • 5.8.2 Continual improvement
  • 6.15.2 Information security reviews

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 7 controls

FedRAMP High · 6 controls

  • AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
  • CA-2 Control Assessments
  • CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
  • CA-7(4) Continuous Monitoring | Risk Monitoring (CA-7(4))
  • RA-3 Risk Assessment
  • SR-6 Supplier Assessments and Reviews (SR-6)

FedRAMP Moderate · 6 controls

  • AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
  • CA-2 Control Assessments
  • CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
  • CA-7(4) Continuous Monitoring | Risk Monitoring (CA-7(4))
  • RA-3 Risk Assessment
  • SR-6 Supplier Assessments and Reviews (SR-6)

ISO 22301:2019 · 6 controls

  • 10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • 8.5 Exercise programme
  • 8.6 Evaluation of business continuity documentation and capabilities
  • 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
  • 9.3 Management review
  • 9.3.2 Management review input
  • CPS220-11 Annual Audit Review of the Framework
  • CPS220-16 Management Information System and Data Framework
  • CPS220-18 Triennial Comprehensive Review of the Framework
  • CPS220-20 Annual Board Risk Management Declaration
  • CPS220-P47 Minimum Assessment Required by the Framework Review

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 5 controls

  • 10.1 Continual improvement
  • 6.1.2 AI risk assessment
  • 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
  • 9.2 Internal audit
  • 9.3 Management review

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

  • CIS-17.8 Conduct Post-Incident Reviews
  • CIS-18.3 Remediate Penetration Test Findings
  • CIS-7.7 Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities
  • CIS-8.11 Conduct Audit Log Reviews

APRA CPS 234 · 3 controls

  • CPS234-22 Systematic Control Testing Program
  • CPS234-25 Internal Audit Review of Information Security Controls
  • CPS234-P31 Annual Review of Testing Program Sufficiency

SOC 2 · 3 controls

  • SOC2-CC1.2 CC1.2 Board independence and oversight of internal control (COSO principle 2)
  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
  • CPS230-16 Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
  • CPS230-P30 Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness
  • ISM-0724 Cyber security metrics and KPIs
  • ISM-1918 CISO reporting to audit and risk committee

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

  • C5-COM-03 Internal audits of the information security management system
  • C5-COM-04 Information on information security performance and management assessment of the ISMS

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

  • SPS220-P15 Reasonable Assurance of Prudent and Sound Management
  • ADMF-1.4 Risk management function responsibilities
  • CFTC-SS-36 Internal Reporting and Review by Senior Management and the Board

DORA · 1 control

  • DORA-Art.50 Administrative penalties and remedial measures

GDPR · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

  • Art.20.1 Management body approves the cybersecurity risk-management measures and oversees their implementation

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

  • 3.12.1e Penetration Testing by Independent Agents
  • 53A-3.5 Assess Security and Privacy Capabilities

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Govern

You are reading one control. How much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 have you already done?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-GV.OV-03 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 73 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 174 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 89 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.