DORA
DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection

DORA DORA-Art.50: Administrative penalties and remedial measures

Competent authorities shall have the power to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative penalties and remedial measures for breaches of the Regulation; financial entities should be prepared to evidence compliance and remediate findings.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 24 controls across 13 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • NIST-CSF-GV.OC-03 Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including privacy and civil liberties obligations - are understood and managed
  • NIST-CSF-GV.OV-03 Organizational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-18.3 Remediate Penetration Test Findings
  • CIS-7.2 Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

  • CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones
  • RA-7 Risk Response

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

NIS2 Directive · 2 controls

  • Art.21.4 Take corrective measures without undue delay on finding that the measures are not met
  • Art.32 Cooperate with supervision: inspections, security audits, scans and requests for information and evidence

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
  • CFTC-SS-20 Production of System Safeguards Books and Records

EU AI Act · 1 control

FedRAMP High · 1 control

  • CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones

GDPR · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection

You are reading one control. How much of DORA have you already done?

DORA DORA-Art.50 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of DORA your existing evidence covers. Hold NIS2 Directive and 17 of 26 DORA controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIS2 Directive pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 24 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.