An organization should weigh what arriving in, or pulling out of, a community means economically and socially, including the effect on the basic resources the community relies on to develop sustainably. It should consider: backing efforts to broaden the local economy; favouring local suppliers, helping them develop and improving their capacity to take part in value chains, with particular attention to disadvantaged groups; helping organizations work within the law, and doing business with organizations not yet able to meet legal requirements only when the aim is to tackle poverty, they respect human rights, and they can reasonably be expected to become legally compliant; supporting lasting programmes and partnerships that help community members, above all women and other disadvantaged or vulnerable people, set up businesses and cooperatives and become more productive and entrepreneurial; encouraging careful use of resources, including proper care of domestic animals; opening up its purchasing to community organizations by building their capacity and informing them; backing organizations and individuals that bring the community products and services it needs; and helping local entrepreneurs form associations. It should meet its tax obligations and supply authorities with what they need to assess the tax owed, and consider contributing to employees' retirement savings and pensions.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.