Management review takes into account: where actions from earlier reviews stand; changes in internal and external issues, the organization and its context included; information on how the FSMS is performing and how effective it is, including trends in the results of system updating, monitoring and measurement results, analysis of the verification results for the hazard control plan and the PRPs, nonconformities and corrective actions, internal and external audit results, inspections by customers and regulators, how external providers are performing, how risks and opportunities were reviewed and whether the actions taken on them worked, and how far the FSMS objectives have been achieved; whether resources are adequate; any emergency, incident, withdrawal or recall that took place; relevant information from internal and external communication, including interested parties' requests and complaints; and opportunities to improve continually. Data is presented in a way that lets top management link the information to the stated FSMS objectives.
This control maps to 36 controls across 25 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 36 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.