Top management reviews the ISMS on a set schedule to confirm it remains suitable, adequate and effective, considering where earlier review actions stand; changes in relevant outside and inside issues; feedback on security performance (how nonconformities and corrective actions are trending, what monitoring and measurement show, what audits found, and whether objectives are being met); input from interested parties; the outcome of risk assessment and the status of the treatment plan; and chances to improve; the outputs are decisions on improvement and on any changes the ISMS needs, with documented evidence of the results kept. Held link: the 27003 guidance on 5.1 has top management take part in management review, weigh resource needs there and set objectives for improvement. Implementation points (general practice): prepare inputs so that decisions can be taken, and record decisions with owners and dates for follow-up.
This control maps to 23 controls across 15 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 23 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.