At planned intervals top management shall review the EnMS to confirm it is still suitable, adequate and effective and is aligned with the organization's strategic direction (9.3.1). The review takes into account: how earlier actions stand; changes in the internal and external issues and in the risks and opportunities connected with them; how the EnMS is performing, including how nonconformities and corrective actions are trending, and trends in monitoring and measurement results, in audit results and in the results of compliance evaluation; where continual improvement is possible, competence included; and the energy policy (9.3.2). Inputs on energy performance shall cover how far objectives and energy targets have been reached, energy performance and how it has improved according to monitoring and measurement (EnPIs included), and where the action plans stand (9.3.3). Outputs shall include decisions on opportunities for continual improvement and on any changes the EnMS needs, covering: the energy policy; ways to improve energy performance; the EnBs or EnPIs; objectives, targets, action plans or other elements, and what to do when they are missed; integration with business processes; allocation of resources; and better competence, awareness and communication. Keep documented information recording what the review concluded (9.3.4).
This control maps to 38 controls across 25 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 38 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.