At planned intervals top management reviews the environmental management system to make sure it remains suitable, adequate and effective. The review covers: progress on actions from earlier reviews; changes in internal and external issues, in what interested parties need and expect (compliance obligations included), in significant environmental aspects, and in risks and opportunities; how far environmental objectives have been met; information on environmental performance, including trends in nonconformities and corrective actions, monitoring and measurement results, whether compliance obligations are being met, and audit results; whether resources are adequate; relevant communications from interested parties, complaints included; and opportunities for continual improvement. The outputs of the review include conclusions on whether the system remains suitable, adequate and effective; decisions on opportunities for continual improvement and on any changes the system needs, resources included; actions to take where environmental objectives were missed; opportunities to integrate the system better with other business processes; and any consequences for the organization's strategic direction. Documented information is kept to evidence the review's results.
This control maps to 41 controls across 27 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 41 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.