The organization monitors, measures, analyses and evaluates how it performs environmentally. It decides what is to be monitored and measured, which methods will give valid results, which criteria and suitable indicators it will judge its environmental performance against, when monitoring and measuring take place, and when the results are analysed and evaluated. Only calibrated or verified monitoring and measuring equipment is used, and it is kept in good order as appropriate. The organization evaluates both its environmental performance and how effective the system is, shares relevant environmental performance information inside and outside the organization as its communication processes specify and its compliance obligations demand, and keeps documented information to evidence the results.
This control maps to 18 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 18 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.