Within their ICT risk management framework, entities keep crisis communication plans to disclose responsibly, at a minimum, major ICT-related incidents and any vulnerabilities to clients, counterparts and, where appropriate, the public; they set communication policies for internal staff and external stakeholders that separate staff involved in response and recovery from staff who only need to be informed, and name at least one person to carry out the incident communication strategy and handle public and media contact. Entities listed in Article 16(1) are outside this Article and follow the simplified framework of Article 16 instead.
Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk·Verified against the published standard ·Control text last updated
What else in your programme already covers this
This control maps to 43 controls across 17 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
NIST-CSF-RC.CO-03 Recovery activities and progress in restoring operational capabilities are communicated to designated internal and external stakeholders
NIST-CSF-RC.CO-04 Public updates on incident recovery are shared using approved methods and messaging
NIST-CSF-RS.CO-02 Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents
NIST-CSF-RS.CO-03 Information is shared with designated internal and external stakeholders
You are reading one control. How much of DORA have you already done?
DORA DORA-Art.14 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of DORA your existing evidence covers. Hold NIS2 Directive and 17 of 26 DORA controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIS2 Directive pair alone.