DORA
DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management

DORA DORA-Art.16: Simplified ICT risk management framework

Specified smaller and non-interconnected financial entities are subject to a simplified ICT risk management framework with proportionate requirements (sound systems, monitoring, business continuity, incident handling and testing).

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 28 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

  • CIS-11.1 Establish and Maintain a Data Recovery Process
  • CIS-13.1 Centralize Security Event Alerting
  • CIS-17.4 Establish and Maintain an Incident Response Process

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

  • CP-2 Contingency Plan
  • IR-4 Incident Handling
  • SI-4 System Monitoring

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

  • CP-2 Contingency Plan
  • IR-4 Incident Handling
  • SI-4 System Monitoring

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation 
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 8.16 Monitoring activities

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 8.16 Monitoring activities
  • NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01 Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04 Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
  • NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03 Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

SOC 2 · 3 controls

  • SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies
  • SOC2-CC7.4 CC7.4 Responding to security incidents
  • SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

  • Art.21.1 Take proportionate all-hazards measures calibrated to the entity's own risk exposure

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management

You are reading one control. How much of DORA have you already done?

DORA DORA-Art.16 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of DORA your existing evidence covers. Hold NIS2 Directive and 17 of 26 DORA controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIS2 Directive pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 28 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.