DORA
DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management

DORA DORA-Art.6: ICT risk management framework

Financial entities shall have a sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT risk management framework as part of their overall risk management system, enabling them to address ICT risk quickly, efficiently and comprehensively, reviewed at least annually and audited periodically by ICT-audit staff.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 72 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 7 controls

  • CPS230-15 Operational Risk Elements of the Risk Management Framework
  • CPS230-16 Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
  • CPS230-49 Internal Audit Review of Proposed Critical Operation Outsourcing
  • CPS230-66 Review of Operational Risk Management
  • CPS230-9 Management of the Full Range of Operational Risks
  • CPS230-P12 Key Principles for Operational Risk, Resilience and Service Providers
  • CPS230-P18 Integration with the Risk Management Framework and Recovery Planning

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 7 controls

C5 (Germany) · 6 controls

  • C5-COM-03 Internal audits of the information security management system
  • C5-OIS-01 Information Security Management System (ISMS)
  • C5-OIS-06 Risk Management Policy
  • C5-OIS-07 Application of the Risk Management Policy
  • C5-SP-02 Review and Approval of Policies and Instructions
  • C5-SP-03 Exceptions from Existing Policies and Instructions

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 5 controls

  • CFTC-SS-1 Program of Risk Analysis and Oversight
  • CFTC-SS-17 Enterprise Technology Risk Assessment
  • CFTC-SS-2 Enterprise Risk Management and Governance Category
  • CFTC-SS-24 Periodic Update of the Recovery Plan and Emergency Procedures
  • CFTC-SS-7 Generally Accepted Standards and Best Practices

FedRAMP High · 5 controls

  • CA-2 Control Assessments
  • CA-2(1) Independent Assessors
  • PL-2 System Security and Privacy Plans
  • RA-1 Policy and Procedures
  • RA-3 Risk Assessment

FedRAMP Moderate · 5 controls

  • CA-2 Control Assessments
  • CA-2(1) Independent Assessors
  • PL-2 System Security and Privacy Plans
  • RA-1 Policy and Procedures
  • RA-3 Risk Assessment

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 5 controls

  • NIST-CSF-GV.OV-02 The cybersecurity risk management strategy is reviewed and adjusted to ensure coverage of organizational requirements and risks
  • NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced
  • NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organizational mission
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01 Risk management objectives are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03 Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 4 controls

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.1 CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
  • SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
  • SOC2-CC5.3 CC5.3 Deploying controls through policies and procedures (COSO principle 12)

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

  • CIS-3.1 Establish and Maintain a Data Management Process
  • CIS-4.1 Establish and Maintain a Secure Configuration Process
  • CIS-7.1 Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process

EU AI Act · 3 controls

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.1 Policies for information security
  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.1 Policies for information security
  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

NIS2 Directive · 3 controls

  • Art.21.1 Take proportionate all-hazards measures calibrated to the entity's own risk exposure
  • Art.21.2.a Policies on risk analysis and on information system security
  • Art.21.2.f Policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of the cybersecurity risk-management measures

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) · 2 controls

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2019/04) · 1 control

  • EBA-GL-3.3.1 Organisation and objectives

EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) · 1 control

  • PSD2-Art.95 Management of operational and security risks (PSD2 Article 95)

GDPR · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management

You are reading one control. How much of DORA have you already done?

DORA DORA-Art.6 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of DORA your existing evidence covers. Hold NIS2 Directive and 17 of 26 DORA controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIS2 Directive65.4% covered · 9 gapsIf you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.157.7% covered · 11 gapsIf you hold ISO 27001:202253.8% covered · 12 gapsIf you hold ISO 27002:202253.8% covered · 12 gapsIf you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 553.8% covered · 12 gapsIf you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.050% covered · 13 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIS2 Directive pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 eachBrowse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 72 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll DORA controls