Where a safety standard for consumer goods of a kind is in force, a business must not, in trade or commerce, supply goods of that kind that do not comply, offer them for supply (other than for export), or manufacture, possess or control them for supply (a defence exists where this was not for supply other than export), and must not export them without the Commonwealth Minister's written approval. A person who suffers loss because of a defect, dangerous characteristic, foreseeable misuse or missing information that compliance would have prevented is taken to have suffered it because of the supply.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.