Cross-Framework Mapping

Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670)vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
67
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 19% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 75 Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls identifies 67 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Consumer Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 75 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 359K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 359K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Controller Obligations(4 mappings)

CPA-CO-1Privacy Notice Requirements
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7
CPA-CO-2Purpose Limitation
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7
CPA-CO-3Data Minimization
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7
CTDPA-9Consent for Sensitive Data
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions

Consumer Rights(3 mappings)

CPA-CR-1Right to Access
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7
CPA-CR-2Right to Correction
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7

Definitions and Applicability(1 mappings)

FDBR-704Exemptions (§501.704)
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions

Related Comparisons

Other Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (359K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) has 75 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 60 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Consumer Rights, where 29 Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 75 total Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls, 8 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 67 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

67 Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Consumer Rights with 29 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Consumer Rights (29 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.