Cross-Framework Mapping

Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 25% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 55 Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Consumer Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 55 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Controller Obligations(10 mappings)

CPA-CO-1Privacy Notice Requirements2 targets
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
CPA-CO-2Purpose Limitation2 targets
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
CPA-CO-3Data Minimization2 targets
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
CTDPA-9Consent for Sensitive Data
Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
LEB-15Penalties and Enforcement2 targets
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
Sec. 314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
TIPA-8Sensitive Data Consent
Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication

Consumer Rights(8 mappings)

CPA-CR-1Right to Access2 targets
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
CPA-CR-2Right to Correction2 targets
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability2 targets
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
s.6(1)Right to Deletion2 targets
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery

Definitions and Applicability(2 mappings)

FDBR-702Definitions (§501.702)2 targets
Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) has 55 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Consumer Rights, where 21 Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 55 total Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls, 14 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

41 Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Consumer Rights with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Consumer Rights (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.