NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)vsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)
See exactly how NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls map to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) maps to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) with 14% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security Program.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Definitions and Scope(10 mappings)
Information Security Program(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons
Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 49 controls across its framework, while AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security Program, where 14 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) equivalent.
How many controls map between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?
Of 49 total NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls, 7 map directly to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?
42 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct equivalent in AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security Program with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security Program (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.