Virginia CDPAvsUtah Consumer Privacy Act
See exactly how Virginia CDPA controls map to Utah Consumer Privacy Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Virginia CDPA maps to Utah Consumer Privacy Act with 54% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 Virginia CDPA controls identifies 16 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in VCDPA 59.1-579 to 580: Data Protection Assessments and Processors.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.
VCDPA 59.1-575 to 576: Definitions, Scope and Exemptions(2 mappings)
VCDPA 59.1-577: Consumer Rights(5 mappings)
VCDPA 59.1-578: Controller Duties(8 mappings)
VCDPA 59.1-579 to 580: Data Protection Assessments and Processors(1 mappings)
VCDPA 59.1-581 to 582: De-identified Data and Exceptions(1 mappings)
VCDPA 59.1-583 to 584: Enforcement(3 mappings)
+2 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 692 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A Virginia CDPA to Utah Consumer Privacy Act crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Utah Consumer Privacy Act controls your existing Virginia CDPA work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 54% in the header counts how many Virginia CDPA controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Utah Consumer Privacy Act controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Virginia CDPA comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 692 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Virginia CDPA and Utah Consumer Privacy Act?
Virginia CDPA has 35 controls across its framework, while Utah Consumer Privacy Act covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (54% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in VCDPA 59.1-579 to 580: Data Protection Assessments and Processors, where 3 Virginia CDPA controls have no direct Utah Consumer Privacy Act equivalent.
How many controls map between Virginia CDPA and Utah Consumer Privacy Act?
Of 35 total Virginia CDPA controls, 19 map directly to Utah Consumer Privacy Act controls, representing 54% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Virginia CDPA to Utah Consumer Privacy Act?
16 Virginia CDPA controls have no direct equivalent in Utah Consumer Privacy Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in VCDPA 59.1-579 to 580: Data Protection Assessments and Processors with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Virginia CDPA and Utah Consumer Privacy Act?
The domain with the highest gap count is VCDPA 59.1-579 to 580: Data Protection Assessments and Processors (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.