Cross-Framework Mapping

US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity RequirementsvsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 23% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Enforcement and Penalties(10 mappings)

BSA-ENF-1Anti-Structuring Prohibition3 targets
FTC-314.1Purpose and Scope
FTC-314.3Information Security Program Standards
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
UKTSA-ENF-05Security Breach Notification3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers2 targets
FTC-314.4c6Secure Data Disposal
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection

Certification and Compliance(5 mappings)

CERT-1RRA Certification to EPA2 targets
FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
KR-CSAP-CC-03Incident Reporting3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan

Cybersecurity-Specific Requirements(5 mappings)

CYBER-2Access Control Practices2 targets
FTC-314.4c1Access Controls
FTC-314.4c5Multi-Factor Authentication
CYBER-4Cybersecurity Incident Response3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements has 48 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 22 US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 48 total US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls, 11 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

37 US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.