Cross-Framework Mapping

Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013vsUK Bribery Act 2010

See exactly how Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls map to UK Bribery Act 2010. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 maps to UK Bribery Act 2010 with 10% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title IV — Security and Safety (Entry and Exit).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Title I — Authorised Economic Operators and Security(3 mappings)

Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions3 targets
Principle 3Defines Desired Culture
Section 6(5)Definition of Foreign Public Official
Section 8Definition of Associated Person

Title I — General Provisions (Data and Electronic Systems)(3 mappings)

Art. 8Data Categories3 targets
Principle 3Defines Desired Culture
Section 6(5)Definition of Foreign Public Official
Section 8Definition of Associated Person

Related Comparisons

Other Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 comparisons

Other UK Bribery Act 2010 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and UK Bribery Act 2010?

Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 has 20 controls across its framework, while UK Bribery Act 2010 covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title IV — Security and Safety (Entry and Exit), where 6 Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls have no direct UK Bribery Act 2010 equivalent.

How many controls map between Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and UK Bribery Act 2010?

Of 20 total Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls, 2 map directly to UK Bribery Act 2010 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 to UK Bribery Act 2010?

18 Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls have no direct equivalent in UK Bribery Act 2010. The highest concentration of gaps is in Title IV — Security and Safety (Entry and Exit) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and UK Bribery Act 2010?

The domain with the highest gap count is Title IV — Security and Safety (Entry and Exit) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.