Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013vsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience
See exactly how Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls map to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 maps to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience with 45% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title IX — Electronic Systems and Transitional Provisions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Title I — General Provisions (Data and Electronic Systems)(11 mappings)
Title IV — Security and Safety (Entry and Exit)(5 mappings)
Title I — Authorised Economic Operators and Security(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 comparisons
Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 has 20 controls across its framework, while BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title IX — Electronic Systems and Transitional Provisions, where 4 Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls have no direct BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience equivalent.
How many controls map between Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
Of 20 total Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls, 9 map directly to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
11 Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls have no direct equivalent in BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. The highest concentration of gaps is in Title IX — Electronic Systems and Transitional Provisions with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
The domain with the highest gap count is Title IX — Electronic Systems and Transitional Provisions (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.