Cross-Framework Mapping

UK Bribery Act 2010vsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)

See exactly how UK Bribery Act 2010 controls map to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK Bribery Act 2010 maps to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) with 15% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 UK Bribery Act 2010 controls identifies 17 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Bribery Act Sections 10 to 15: Prosecution, Penalties and Jurisdiction.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Bribery Act Sections 1 to 6: Offences(3 mappings)

Section 6(5)Definition of Foreign Public Official3 targets
DA-1Enterprise Data Architecture
DIQ-2Data Quality Management
RMD-1Reference Data Management

Bribery Act Sections 7 to 9: Failure to Prevent and Adequate Procedures(3 mappings)

Section 8Definition of Associated Person3 targets
DA-1Enterprise Data Architecture
DIQ-2Data Quality Management
RMD-1Reference Data Management

Due Diligence(2 mappings)

UKBRIBE-3Due Diligence on Third Parties2 targets
DA-1Enterprise Data Architecture
DIQ-2Data Quality Management
Coverage crosswalk

A UK Bribery Act 2010 to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls your existing UK Bribery Act 2010 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

UK Bribery Act 2010 into DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) into UK Bribery Act 2010
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

UK Bribery Act 2010 to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 15% in the header counts how many UK Bribery Act 2010 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other UK Bribery Act 2010 comparisons

Other DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between UK Bribery Act 2010 and DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

UK Bribery Act 2010 has 20 controls across its framework, while DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Bribery Act Sections 10 to 15: Prosecution, Penalties and Jurisdiction, where 7 UK Bribery Act 2010 controls have no direct DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) equivalent.

How many controls map between UK Bribery Act 2010 and DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

Of 20 total UK Bribery Act 2010 controls, 3 map directly to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls, representing 15% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Bribery Act 2010 to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

17 UK Bribery Act 2010 controls have no direct equivalent in DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition). The highest concentration of gaps is in Bribery Act Sections 10 to 15: Prosecution, Penalties and Jurisdiction with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Bribery Act 2010 and DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Bribery Act Sections 10 to 15: Prosecution, Penalties and Jurisdiction (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.