Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019)vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 50% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part I — Preliminary.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Part I — Preliminary(12 mappings)
Part III — Data Collection and Processing(3 mappings)
Offenses and Penalties(4 mappings)
Part II — Principles of Data Protection(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) has 26 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part I — Preliminary, where 6 Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 26 total Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) controls, 13 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
13 Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part I — Preliminary with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Uganda Data Protection and Privacy Act (2019) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is Part I — Preliminary (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.