TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

TNFD RecommendationsvsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)

See exactly how TNFD Recommendations controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

TNFD Recommendations maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 30% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 TNFD Recommendations controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Strategy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Strategy(7 mappings)

AASB-S2-10Risk Classification and Timeframes
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
AASB-S2-22Scenario Analysis for Climate Resilience2 targets
→DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
AASB-S2-9eClimate Resilience2 targets
→DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
TNFD-STR-CResilience of Strategy2 targets
→DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System

Governance(7 mappings)

AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance3 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
IM8-GOV.2Roles and Responsibilities
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
IM8-GOV.4ICT Security Risk Management3 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management

General Requirements(6 mappings)

Clause 1Risk management5 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
Clause 2Personnel
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other TNFD Recommendations comparisons

TNFD Recommendations vs EU Taxonomy Regulation14 mappingsTNFD Recommendations vs EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)13 mappingsTNFD Recommendations vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)12 mappingsTNFD Recommendations vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange12 mappingsTNFD Recommendations vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices12 mappingsTNFD Recommendations vs GLBA12 mappingsTNFD Recommendations vs OSFI B-1312 mappingsTNFD Recommendations vs SWIFT CSP12 mappings

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between TNFD Recommendations and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

TNFD Recommendations has 40 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Strategy, where 9 TNFD Recommendations controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between TNFD Recommendations and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Of 40 total TNFD Recommendations controls, 12 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping TNFD Recommendations to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

28 TNFD Recommendations controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Strategy with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between TNFD Recommendations and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Strategy (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.