TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023)vsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP

See exactly how Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) controls map to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) maps to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP with 47% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter 1 — Scope and Application (Articles 1–4).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter 2 — General Provisions (Articles 5–18)(8 mappings)

FADP-10Cross-Border Disclosure (Articles 16–18)
→Art. 27Penalties for Cross-Border Transfer Violations
FADP-5Definitions (Article 5)5 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Data Categories
FADP-7Data Protection Impact Assessment (Articles 9–10)
→Art. 33Criminal Offences
FADP-9Data Protection Advisor (Articles 14–15)
→Art. 33Criminal Offences

Chapter 3 — Data Subject Rights (Articles 19–24)(12 mappings)

FADP-11Duty to Inform (Article 19)5 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 8Data Categories
FADP-12Right of Access (Article 25)5 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 8Data Categories
FADP-13Right to Data Portability (Article 28)2 targets
→Art. 10Consent Requirements
→Art. 2Consent Definition

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) comparisons

Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 20239 mappingsSwitzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector9 mappingsSwitzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs Ethiopia Personal Data Protection Proclamation (No. 1321/2024)9 mappingsSwitzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019)9 mappingsSwitzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data9 mappingsSwitzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs Uzbekistan Law on Personal Data (No. ZRU-547)9 mappingsSwitzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)9 mappingsSwitzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs Greece Law 4624/2019 — Hellenic Data Protection Authority (HDPA) Implementation Act9 mappings

Other Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP15 mappingsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsMontenegro Law on Personal Data Protection (2023) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsNorth Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsGhana Data Protection Act 2012 (Act 843) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) has 19 controls across its framework, while Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 1 — Scope and Application (Articles 1–4), where 4 Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) controls have no direct Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP equivalent.

How many controls map between Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

Of 19 total Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) controls, 9 map directly to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

10 Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) controls have no direct equivalent in Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 1 — Scope and Application (Articles 1–4) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Switzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 1 — Scope and Application (Articles 1–4) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.