Cross-Framework Mapping

SWIFT CSCFvsUK Open Banking Standard

See exactly how SWIFT CSCF controls map to UK Open Banking Standard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SWIFT CSCF maps to UK Open Banking Standard with 23% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 SWIFT CSCF controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 463K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 463K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.

Restrict Internet Access and Protect Critical Systems(2 mappings)

1.2Operating System Privileged Account Control
OB-OPS.2Performance Standards
1.3Virtualisation Platform Protection
OB-OPS.2Performance Standards

Detect Anomalous Activity to Systems or Transaction Records(3 mappings)

6.4Logging and Monitoring3 targets
OB-CX.3Strong Customer Authentication
OB-DIR.1Open Banking Directory
OB-SEC.4Certificate Management

SWIFT CSCF: Information Security Governance(1 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-05Roles and responsibilities definition
OB-OPS.2Performance Standards

SWIFT CSCF: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-09Encryption and key management2 targets
OB-SEC.2Transport Layer Security
OB-SEC.4Certificate Management

SWIFT CSCF: Operational Resilience(6 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-11Business continuity planning and testing2 targets
OB-API.4MI Reporting Specification
OB-OPS.1API Availability Requirements
SWIFT-CSCF-12Disaster recovery procedures2 targets
OB-API.4MI Reporting Specification
OB-OPS.1API Availability Requirements
SWIFT-CSCF-14Critical service identification2 targets
OB-API.4MI Reporting Specification
OB-OPS.1API Availability Requirements

SWIFT CSCF: Incident Management & Reporting(3 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-21Incident detection and classification
OB-OPS.4Incident Management
SWIFT-CSCF-23Regulatory reporting requirements
OB-OPS.4Incident Management
SWIFT-CSCF-24Customer notification procedures
OB-OPS.4Incident Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 726 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (463K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SWIFT CSCF and UK Open Banking Standard?

SWIFT CSCF has 47 controls across its framework, while UK Open Banking Standard covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities, where 8 SWIFT CSCF controls have no direct UK Open Banking Standard equivalent.

How many controls map between SWIFT CSCF and UK Open Banking Standard?

Of 47 total SWIFT CSCF controls, 11 map directly to UK Open Banking Standard controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SWIFT CSCF to UK Open Banking Standard?

36 SWIFT CSCF controls have no direct equivalent in UK Open Banking Standard. The highest concentration of gaps is in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SWIFT CSCF and UK Open Banking Standard?

The domain with the highest gap count is Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.