TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat FrameworkvsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 20% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance and Collective Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Ground Segment Threats(6 mappings)

GT-2Physical Security Threats2 targets
→ISO27001-A.7.1Defined secure zones and boundaries
→ISO27001-A.7.4Physical surveillance and monitoring
GT-3Supply Chain Compromise3 targets
→ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
→ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
→ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring
GT-4Social Engineering Attacks
→ISO27001-A.6.3Security awareness and competence programmes

Threat Intelligence Sharing(1 mappings)

TI-3Indicator of Compromise Sharing
→ISO27001-A.5.7Cyber threat intelligence gathering

Related Comparisons

Other Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework comparisons

Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs ISO/IEC 27011:20244 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.03 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation3 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs RBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks3 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)3 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)3 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs ITU Radio Regulations and Space Security Standards3 mappings

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs ISO 27001:202230 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO 27001:202226 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs ISO 27001:202224 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs ISO 27001:202223 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs ISO 27001:202222 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs ISO 27001:202222 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs ISO 27001:202222 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO 27001:202221 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework and ISO 27001:2022?

Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework has 20 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 95 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance and Collective Security, where 4 Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 20 total Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls, 4 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework to ISO 27001:2022?

16 Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance and Collective Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Governance and Collective Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.