Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea PIPAvsNIS2 Directive

See exactly how South Korea PIPA controls map to NIS2 Directive. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea PIPA maps to NIS2 Directive with 20% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 South Korea PIPA controls identifies 50 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in South Korea PIPA: Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 357K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 357K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Korea PIPA - CPO - Privacy Officer - PIA - Personal Information Impact Assessment - ISMS-P Certification - Articles 31-33(10 mappings)

PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-3310 targets
Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception
Art.13Prohibition of Data Interference
Art.20Service Provider Duties
Art.25Preservation of Stored Data
Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data
NIS2-07Personnel risk assessment
NIS2-17Recovery plan for critical systems
NIS2-18Reporting obligations to authorities
NIS2-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies
NIS2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

Korea PIPA - Cross-Border Transfer - Articles 28-8 - 28-9 - Adequacy - EU 2021 - SCCs - ISMS-P Certification(6 mappings)

PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 20216 targets
Art.19Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio Functions
Art.26Production Orders
Art.34Penalties for Legal Entities
NIS2-06Physical and logical access controls
NIS2-08Electronic access perimeter management
NIS2-09Interactive remote access security

Korea PIPA - Data Subject Rights - Access - Correction - Erasure - Suspension - Portability - Automated Decisions - Articles 35-37-2(4 mappings)

PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-374 targets
Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
Art.2Scope
Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 704 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (357K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea PIPA and NIS2 Directive?

South Korea PIPA has 50 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive covers 80 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in South Korea PIPA: Data Subject Rights, where 7 South Korea PIPA controls have no direct NIS2 Directive equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea PIPA and NIS2 Directive?

Of 50 total South Korea PIPA controls, 0 map directly to NIS2 Directive controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 50 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea PIPA to NIS2 Directive?

50 South Korea PIPA controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive. The highest concentration of gaps is in South Korea PIPA: Data Subject Rights with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea PIPA and NIS2 Directive?

The domain with the highest gap count is South Korea PIPA: Data Subject Rights (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.